Hardware-independent automotive software testing
Automate your software testing with an AI-driven fuzzing platform for early bug and vulnerability detection, all without hardware dependencies. Enable your developers to reproduce and fix issues in minutes, not weeks.

Three reasons to elevate your automotive software security with fuzz testing
Find critical bugs and their root cause in minutes
White-box fuzzing is the fastest way to detect memory corruption errors and find their root cause. It analyzes source code and shows exactly where and how an issue occurs.
Enable Software-in-the-Loop testing
With Code Intelligence, you can test Classic AUTOSAR Applications at the system level by using our simulator and identify real-time bugs without the need for specialized hardware.
Comply with industry standards
Fuzz testing is highly recommended by ISO/SAE 21434 'Road vehicles — Cybersecurity engineering', and Automotive SPICE for Cybersecurity.

%20-%20Cropped.jpg)


Fuzz Testing with Code Intelligence

Find what others miss – and get it fixed
CWE-119 | Improper Restriction of Operations Within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer | CWE-416 | Use After Free |
CWE-823 | Use of Out-of-Range Pointer Offset | CWE-476 | NULL Pointer Dereference |
CWE-786 | Access of Memory Location Before Start of Buffer | CWE-590 | Free Memory Not on the Heap |
CWE-680 | Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow | CWE-362 | Signal Handler Race Condition |
CWE-466 | Return of Pointer Value Outside of Expected Range | CWE-366 | Race Condition Within a Thread |
CWE-787 | Out-of-Bounds Write | CWE-367 | Time-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Race Condition |
CWE-125 | Out-of-Bounds Read | CWE-368 | Context Switching Race Condition |
CWE-129 | Improper Validation of Array Index | CWE-421 | Race Condition During Access to Alternate Channel |
CWE-193 | Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size | CWE-1223 | Context Switching Race Condition |
CWE-193 | Off-by-One Error | CWE-662 | Improper Synchronization |
CWE-195 | Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error | CWE-758 | Reliance on Undefined, Unspecified, or Implementation-Defined Behavior |
CWE-839 | Numeric Range Comparison Without Minimum Check | CWE-562 | Return of Stack Variable Address |
CWE-843 | Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ("Type Confusion") | CWE-587 | Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer |
CWE-1257 | Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Ranges | CWE-588 | Attempt to Access Child of a Non-Structure Pointer |
CWE-190 | Integer Overflow or Wraparound | CWE-1102 | Reliance on Machine-Dependent Third-Party Components |
CWE-20 | Improper Input Validation | CWE-1105 | Insufficient Encapsulation of Machine-Dependent Functionality |
CWE-415 | Double Free |
From start to findings – with one command
.webp?width=350&height=350&name=AI%20Test%20Agent%20(new).webp)
Don’t just comply – make your product robust
See AI-Automated Fuzz Testing In Action
Book your free demo with one of our senior engineers now and take the first step towards robust, secure software development with Code Intelligence.
- Automate software testing for embedded systems.
- Detect critical bugs & vulnerabilities early in the development.
- Uncover only actual issues without false positives.
- Enable developers to reproduce & fix issues in minutes, not weeks.
- Ensure compliance with industry standards.
Why Static Code Analysis alone can't prevent all vulnerabilities
1. Static Analysis (SAST) generates many false positives.
It reports issues that aren’t actually a problem and produces duplicates.
2. Static Analysis can’t detect all types of vulnerabilities.
Because it doesn’t analyze the program during execution, SAST can’t detect dynamic or runtime-specific issues such as complex buffer overflows, use-after-free, double-free errors, heap corruption, and others.
Learn more about its limitation and how to overcome them with fuzz testing by downloading a free copy of the white paper.